EA Sports FC 24

The critics generally highlight several positive aspects of EA Sports FC 24’s Career Mode and storytelling elements. Twinfinite praises the inclusion of features like PlayStyles, player focuses, training schedules, and agent interactions, noting that these additions bring a level of depth reminiscent of Football Manager. Similarly, PlaySense acknowledges minor but meaningful updates, such as the introduction of play styles and player agents, which enhance strategic decision-making. Generación Xbox commends the revamped chemistry system and player interactions, suggesting they add fun and complexity to the experience. Meanwhile, IGN Brasil points to broader improvements in menus and gameplay elements, while Pure Nintendo emphasizes the game’s authenticity through licensed players and teams. These reviews collectively suggest a focus on refining mechanics and expanding player agency within the Career Mode. However, some critics express concerns about the narrative and depth of the story. IGN Japan is critical of the lack of storytelling depth in Career Mode, particularly highlighting unrealistic elements like personality points and odd objectives that feel disconnected from the game’s core football experience. While other reviewers focus on gameplay mechanics rather than narrative structure, this critique underscores a potential gap in how the game balances realism with creative design choices. The mention of "unrealistic" aspects by IGN Japan contrasts with the more positive feedback on system-level improvements, indicating that while the game’s technical and strategic elements have evolved, its storytelling may still feel underdeveloped or inconsistent. Overall, the consensus among critics leans toward a cautiously optimistic view of EA Sports FC 24’s Career Mode and story elements. While Twinfinite and PlaySense celebrate the added depth and new mechanics, IGN Japan’s criticism reflects lingering concerns about narrative coherence and realism. The majority of reviews, however, emphasize that the game represents a step forward in terms of player agency and complexity, with improvements like PlayStyles, chemistry systems, and agent interactions being widely appreciated. Despite some reservations, the general sentiment suggests that FC 24 successfully builds on its predecessors while addressing key areas for growth, even if not without flaws.

The gameplay of EA Sports FC 24 receives widespread praise for its incremental improvements and new features that enhance realism and player customization. Many critics highlight the introduction of PlayStyles, which allows players to embody distinct on-field personas, adding depth to team dynamics and strategy (Comicbook.com, IGN Spain, The Loadout). The Frostbite engine brings smoother animations and more responsive controls, particularly noted on Nintendo Switch (IGN) and PS5 (IGN France). Features like Precision Passing, Controlled Sprint Dribble, and Hypermotion V technology are lauded for improving ball physics, player movement, and tactical nuance (TechRadar Gaming, VG247, KeenGamer). Additionally, the Career Mode sees upgrades with tools like Tactical Vision and assistant coaches (IGN Brasil), while Ultimate Team benefits from refined mechanics and inclusivity (XboxEra). Critics like VG247 and Guardian emphasize the game’s dynamic, strategic feel, with improved passing fluidity and player responsiveness. Despite these positives, several critics point to persistent flaws that hinder the experience. Issues with defensive AI and goalkeeper behavior are recurring complaints, with Generación Xbox and Meristation noting unbalanced defending mechanics and erratic goalkeeping. Some reviewers criticize the gameplay as repetitive and familiar, with Screen Rant and Comicbook.com highlighting sluggish player movement and a lack of significant evolution from previous iterations. Others point to technical shortcomings, such as optimization problems on Nintendo Switch (Screen Rant) and scripted elements that detract from realism (IGN France). The AI’s inconsistency, particularly in teammate coordination and set-piece execution, is another frequent critique (GameGrin, Meristation), while TheGamer notes flaws in tackling and ball physics. These issues suggest that while the game feels polished, it still struggles with core gameplay mechanics. Overall, critics agree that EA Sports FC 24 is an evolution rather than a revolution, offering meaningful refinements without fundamentally reimagining the formula. The PlayStyles system and Hypermotion tech are standout additions that enhance authenticity and player variety (IGN Spain, TechRadar Gaming), while improvements in animations and control responsiveness (VG247, Guardian) elevate the experience. However, persistent issues like AI shortcomings and repetitive gameplay prevent it from feeling groundbreaking. As IGN and PC Gamer note, the game strikes a balance between innovation and familiarity, appealing to longtime fans while addressing some long-standing criticisms. While not without flaws, the consensus leans toward positive reception, with many viewing it as a solid iteration that builds on FIFA’s legacy while acknowledging room for future growth.

The majority of critics praise EA Sports FC 24 for its significant visual improvements over previous iterations, particularly highlighting advancements in realism, animations, and technical execution. The integration of the Frostbite engine and HyperMotion V technology is frequently lauded for delivering smoother player movements, lifelike animations, and enhanced stadium atmospheres. For instance, IGN Spain and GameGrin emphasize the "realistic player movements" and "smoother animations," while Metro GameCentral applauds the "fabulous TV-style presentation" and immersive virtual dressing rooms. Critics like MGG and The Games Machine note the attention to detail in player models, fabric simulation, and lighting, creating a more authentic football experience. Additionally, improvements in UI design—such as sleek menus, dynamic background changes, and revamped interfaces—are highlighted by outlets like GamingBolt and Digital Chumps, contributing to a modernized aesthetic. The inclusion of features like "Match Style" systems and detailed player statistics further enhances the visual depth, as noted by Checkpoint Gaming and Gamersky. Despite these positives, several critics point out notable drawbacks, particularly in technical performance and consistency across platforms. IGN (Nintendo Switch) criticizes the game for falling short of next-gen standards, citing glitches, dropped frames, and poor load times, while Screen Rant on the same platform notes the 30FPS cap causing a "sluggish" feel. On PS5, issues like repetitive commentary (Twinfinite), clunky animations (VGC), and minor bugs (GamePro Germany) are mentioned, though these are often overshadowed by the overall quality. Some critics, such as VG247 and The Loadout, acknowledge limited visual refreshes but still consider them an improvement over prior titles. Additionally, concerns about "placeholder translation text" (Checkpoint Gaming) and inconsistent AI behavior (IGN Japan) highlight areas where the game’s polish feels incomplete. While the Xbox Series X version receives praise for 4K resolution and 60 FPS (Generación Xbox), others like Pure Xbox note the removal of pre-match introductions as a strange design choice. Overall, critics agree that EA Sports FC 24 represents a substantial leap in visual fidelity and immersion compared to FIFA 23, with many hailing it as the "best-looking football sim to date" (Dexerto) and praising its attention to detail in stadiums, player models, and animations. However, technical inconsistencies—particularly on older hardware like the Nintendo Switch—and lingering issues with AI, commentary, and optimization create a mixed reception. While outlets like IGN (PS5) and XboxEra celebrate the game’s "gorgeous presentation" and "vibrant soccer atmosphere," others like Screen Rant and VG247 acknowledge that it is not without flaws. The consensus leans toward optimism, with most critics recognizing FC 24 as a visually impressive evolution of the franchise, even if it doesn’t fully meet all expectations for next-gen performance or consistency across platforms.

The overall reception of the sound design and music in EA Sports FC 24 is largely positive, with many critics highlighting its immersive and authentic audio experience. Reviewers like Everyeye.it praised the "immersive audiovisual elements" that enhance the football atmosphere, while GameGrin noted improvements in sound design despite some technical hiccups. The inclusion of new commentators such as Guy Mowbray and Laure Boulleau—described by IGN France as adding "energy and variety"—was a standout feature, alongside the refreshed commentary team mentioned by GameOver.gr. Additionally, the soundtrack received acclaim for its diversity, with KeenGamer celebrating popular artists like Kendrick Lamar and Jack Harlow, and Metro GameCentral lauding the "consistently excellent" music throughout the game. The addition of Spanish commentators (Hobby Consolas) and club anthems also contributed to a more authentic matchday feel, as noted by Twinfinite. However, some criticisms emerged regarding consistency and innovation in the audio elements. IGN Spain and Twinfinite pointed out that new commentators like DjMariiO and Miguel Ángel Román failed to significantly elevate immersion, with the latter feeling repetitive and lacking fresh dialogue. PlaySense noted that while the soundtrack enhanced the experience, the commentary "lacked variety," a sentiment echoed by TheGamer, who criticized stilted delivery and technical issues like crashes in Career Mode. VideoGamer mentioned specific sound-related glitches, such as controller noise and net ripple effects, though they didn’t elaborate on broader music or design flaws. These concerns suggest that while the audio direction is ambitious, execution occasionally falls short of expectations. Despite mixed feedback, the consensus leans toward appreciation for FC 24’s auditory enhancements. Most critics agree that the game’s sound design and music successfully deepen immersion, with Meristation highlighting "fantastic narration" and MGG noting the historic inclusion of the first female commentator, Laure Boulleau. While technical issues and repetitive commentary elements were acknowledged, they didn’t overshadow the overall positive reception. The blend of diverse soundtracks, authentic crowd reactions (Pure Nintendo), and refreshed commentary teams indicates that FC 24 strikes a balance between innovation and tradition, making it a standout entry in the series despite minor flaws.

The voice acting in EA Sports FC 24 receives generally positive feedback from several reviewers, with praise for its fresh perspectives and immersive qualities. IGN France highlights Laure Boulleau’s contribution as a commentator, noting her ability to enhance the game’s experience, while Meristation applauds Miguel Ángel Román and DjMaRiiO for delivering "fantastic narration" that brings a "fresh perspective." Twinfinite also acknowledges the new voices as a "breath of fresh air," suggesting they elevate the commentary compared to previous iterations. Additionally, Pure Nintendo appreciates the variety introduced by different commentators in each match, which adds realism and keeps the experience dynamic. These positives collectively suggest that the voice acting successfully diversifies the auditory landscape and enriches the gameplay for many players. However, several critics point out notable shortcomings, particularly around repetition and unnatural delivery. TheGamer criticizes the "stitched-together" lines and lack of flow in the commentary, calling it "immersion-breaking," while IGN Spain notes that the new commentators have a "minimal impact on the game’s immersion." Twinfinite echoes this concern, stating that recycled dialogue from prior games risks monotony for frequent players. TheGamer also emphasizes that the voices feel "unnatural," undermining the authenticity of the experience. These critiques highlight a disconnect between the ambition of the voice acting and its execution, with some reviewers feeling that the effort to innovate falls short in key areas. Overall, the consensus among critics is mixed but leans toward cautious optimism. While many praise the introduction of new voices and the variety they bring—particularly from Meristation, Twinfinite, and Pure Nintendo—the recurring issues of recycled dialogue and unnatural delivery, as noted by TheGamer and IGN Spain, suggest room for improvement. The voice acting in FC 24 shows promise in diversifying the commentary experience but struggles with consistency and originality, leaving players divided between appreciating its freshness and critiquing its execution. This duality reflects a game that is on the right track but requires further refinement to fully realize its potential.

The technical performance of EA Sports FC 24 varies across platforms, with notable positives highlighted by several reviewers. On the PlayStation 5, Atomix praised its "impressive technical performance running smoothly at 4K and 60 frames per second," while KeenGamer noted "smooth immersion with clean visuals" and improved AI animation via AI Hands technology. Pocket-lint also commended the game for "impessively short loading times," and IGN highlighted the DualSense controller’s feedback alongside HyperMotion V tech. For the Xbox Series X, GamingBolt reported no technical issues, and Multiplayer.it lauded its "technical advancements like HyperMotion technology." On the Nintendo Switch, while frame rates lag behind (30fps vs. 60fps on other platforms), reviewers like God is a Geek acknowledged it as "perfectly playable," with Nintendo World Report noting "rock solid" performance during gameplay despite minor hiccups in replays. However, technical challenges persist across all platforms. On the PlayStation 5, multiple critics raised concerns: Checkpoint Gaming and Digital Chumps cited "occasional glitches, lag, and freezing issues," particularly in multiplayer, while ComicBook and Jeuxvideo.com highlighted server instability causing disconnections and lost progress. IGN noted AI inconsistencies, and The Games Machine warned of "glitchiness and mini-dropouts" online. On the Xbox Series X, TheGamer reported "frequent crashes and bugs" in Manager Career and Ultimate Team modes, while Press Start Australia mentioned "annoying bugs" like menu lockups. For the Nintendo Switch, IGN criticized "glitches, dropped frames, and poor load times," with Screen Rant pointing to optimization issues in handheld mode. PC users also faced challenges, as PC Gamer noted choppy matches and audio/controller dropout problems. Overall, the consensus reveals a mixed reception. While the PlayStation 5 and Xbox Series X received praise for their technical capabilities—particularly in visuals, responsiveness, and features like HyperMotion V—the Nintendo Switch struggled with frame rate limitations and optimization issues. However, recurring complaints about online stability, server reliability, and AI behavior affected all platforms. Critics like Checkpoint Gaming, IGN, and TheGamer emphasized that while the game’s technical foundation is strong, persistent bugs, lag, and connectivity problems undermined the experience. Despite these flaws, many acknowledged the game’s potential for improvement, with some hoping updates would address issues like AI inconsistencies (as noted by GamePro Germany) or server instability (Jeuxvideo.com). The disparity in performance across platforms also highlighted EA’s challenges in delivering a consistent experience, particularly on the Switch and PC.

The overall sentiment toward the replay value of EA Sports FC 24 is mixed, with several critics highlighting its strengths in modes like Ultimate Team and Career Mode. Many praise the introduction of features such as Evolutions, which allow players to upgrade card stats through objectives, adding depth to FUT (IGN, Jeuxvideo.com). The inclusion of women’s football leagues and enhanced customization options (e.g., PlayStyles, player position changes) is also noted as a positive by critics like Digital Chumps and GameGrin. Additionally, modes like Pro Clubs and Volta Football are seen as offering varied experiences, with GamePro Germany emphasizing crossplay and XboxEra pointing to addictive offline/online modes. The game’s extensive content—over 19,000 players, 700 teams, and 30 leagues (Atomix)—further supports its replayability for fans of the series. However, several critics express concerns about neglected modes and repetitiveness. VGC argues that non-Ultimate Team modes are “left to fight for scraps,” while IGN and GGRecon highlight issues like pay-to-win mechanics in FUT, which could deter free-to-play players. Online modes such as Clubs and Volta face criticism for connection problems (IGN) and a lack of player base (Jeuxvideo.com). GameGrin and The Games Machine note that Career Mode lacks depth, with some features feeling “recycled” or underdeveloped. Additionally, Comicbook.com and Xbox Tavern suggest the game risks becoming repetitive for long-time fans, despite its content volume. These critiques underscore a divide between the game’s ambitious scope and its execution in certain areas. The consensus among critics is that EA Sports FC 24 offers solid replay value but with significant caveats. While Ultimate Team remains a standout mode with innovations like Evolutions (IGN, Jeuxvideo.com), other modes are seen as either underdeveloped or overshadowed by FUT’s monetization issues (GGRecon, GameGrin). The game’s variety and depth—particularly in Career Mode and offline challenges—are praised by outlets like Eurogamer Germany and TheGamer, but many agree that its long-term appeal hinges on addressing flaws like balance, innovation, and online stability. Ultimately, the review landscape reflects a game that delivers for casual and FUT-focused players but struggles to satisfy those seeking broader, more balanced experiences.